Malphara vs generic spreadsheets

When a risk register outgrows the spreadsheet

Spreadsheets are flexible and familiar. The problem starts when ownership, evidence, approvals and board reporting depend on one file being chased and rebuilt.

Illustration representing live risk visibility
A practical comparison

Choose based on the operating problem

A spreadsheet may remain enough for a small, stable register. Malphara becomes relevant when the surrounding process matters as much as the rows.

CapabilityGeneric spreadsheetMalphara
Flexible risk fieldsEasy to add, harder to govern consistentlyConfigured to the agreed taxonomy
Named ownershipNames in cells; follow-up happens elsewhereOwners and actions stay connected to records
Change historyVersion history may show edits, not decision contextTraceable records, evidence and commentary
Controls and findingsSeparate tabs or files with manual linksRelated risk, control, incident and audit records
Board reportingUsually rebuilt for each reporting cycleReporting views built from live data
Alerts and due datesManual reminders and status chasesOwned actions and visible deadlines
Signals it may be time to move

Your file is becoming a workflow

01

Reporting takes days

The committee pack requires manual consolidation, formatting and follow-up each month.

02

Ownership is ambiguous

A name appears in the register, but the action, reminder and evidence live elsewhere.

03

Assurance is fragmented

Risks, controls, incidents and audit findings cannot be reviewed as one connected picture.

Migration without importing the mess

Use the move to simplify the register

Implementation starts by deciding which fields, records and history still serve the process. The goal is not to recreate every spreadsheet convention.

  • Review taxonomy and reporting needs
  • Clean and map the agreed data
  • Configure ownership and workflow
  • Validate with representative users
  • Train teams before go-live
Malphara live risk register replacing spreadsheet-based oversight
A practical first conversation

See how Malphara fits your risk programme

Tell us where oversight is breaking down. We will reply within one working day with a focused agenda for a 30-minute discovery call.

  • Review your current process and reporting needs
  • Identify the most useful module and rollout path
  • Confirm scope, implementation timing and likely cost
Clear from the start Subscriptions from £1,000/month Onboarding from £5,000 Typical go-live in 4-8 weeks

No generic sales deck. The call is shaped around the information you share.